Introduction
Recurrent headaches are not uncommon in children [
1]. The most frequently occurring and debilitating primary headache among this group is the migraine, which can significantly impair a child's life and family dynamics. It can also negatively impact their quality of life. Migraines in children exhibit different clinical characteristics compared to those in adults [
2]. Unlike in adults, migraines in children typically last longer and are often bifrontal or bitemporal in location. They are less common before the age of three. Before puberty, boys are more frequently affected, but after puberty, the condition primarily affects girls. The pain can range from moderate to severe. There are several potential triggers, and a significant family history is present in the majority of cases [
3].
The Paediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Tool (PedMIDAS), a modified version of the Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) for adults, can be used to evaluate disability in children and adolescents [
4]. The diagnosis of a migraine is typically clinical, but additional testing should be conducted to rule out serious secondary causes. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches are used for management. The cornerstone of management is parental education and lifestyle modifications. Acute treatment consists of acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and triptans [
5,
6].
The goal of preventive therapy is to reduce the frequency and intensity of headaches. Other effective medications for the pediatric age group include flunarizine, propranolol, amitriptyline, levetiracetam, valproate, and topiramate. A pediatrician should examine the child to rule out secondary causes of headaches when necessary [
7].
To improve the quality of life and academic performance of a child suffering from migraines, caregivers must be well-informed about this chronic neurological disorder. However, there is a lack of literature regarding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of parents/caregivers concerning childhood migraines, especially in developing countries like India. Therefore, there is a need to study these factors, as they can significantly impact the management and treatment compliance for migraines in children. The objective of this study was to assess the KAP of caregivers of children with migraine.
Materials and Methods
1. Study design
A descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in northern India from December 2022 to May 2023. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Command Hospital, Chandimandir ethical committee (letter number 22/11/CHWC/2022). The written informed consents were taken by all the parents/caregivers.
2. Case selection
The study encompassed children aged between 5 and 18 years who suffered from migraines and were accompanied by parents or caregivers to the pediatric outpatient department (OPD) from December 2022 to May 2023. We screened a total of 120 children with a clinical diagnosis of migraine (as per International Classification of Headache Disorders [ICHD]-3) who visited the OPD. However, 20 were excluded for various reasons, leaving 100 parents or caregivers who completed the questionnaire for the final analysis. The majority of the children had been experiencing symptoms for more than 12 months. We developed a questionnaire by utilising various databases, including Science Direct, Scopus, and PubMed. This questionnaire was subsequently reviewed and refined by experts in migraine management and the Institute's ethics committee. The questionnaire was divided into four sections, each focusing on the subject's demographics, KAP related to migraines (
Appendix 1). The inclusion criteria were parents or caregivers who could speak and read English or the local language (Hindi). Those who were unwilling to participate, unable to read and write, or not willing to provide informed consent were excluded. The number of respondents to the English and Hindi questionnaires was 40 and 60, respectively.
3. Statistical analysis
The collected data were recorded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Redmond, WA, USA). The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were presented as number and percentage, while continuous variables were presented as mean±standard deviation. The chi-square test was used to assess the associations of categorical variables with caregivers’ level of education. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
During the study period, we screened a total of 120 children with migraines who were accompanied by their parents or caregivers at the pediatric neurology OPD and clinic. Of these, 20 were excluded for various reasons. The final analysis included 100 parents or caregivers who responded to the questionnaire (
Fig. 1).
The ages of the children with migraine in the study ranged from 5 to 18 years, with an average age of 10.41±2.54. The boys constituted 53%(n=100) and girls 47% respectively. Most of the caregivers had a good level of education, with approximately 83% being graduates or postgraduates (
Table 1).
1. Evaluation of knowledge about migraine among caregivers
The survey questions related to knowledge about migraines revealed that over 60% of caregivers understood the chronic nature of the illness, its precipitating factors (such as skipping meals, exposure to bright light, stressors, specific food items, and lack of sleep), and the influence of family history and lifestyle modifications. Approximately 57% were aware that the severity of a migraine can dictate the need for migraine prophylaxis, but the majority of caregivers were unfamiliar with the duration of such prophylaxis. Over 60% of caregivers believed that neuroimaging is always necessary for children with migraines. However, around 90% of caregivers were not familiar with the HTP (House, Tree, and Person) psychological test used in relation to migraines (
Table 2).
2. Evaluation of attitudes toward migraine among caregivers
A large majority of caregivers (85%) held the belief that migraines necessitate a consultation with a doctor, and potentially, regular visits for optimal treatment. A substantial proportion of caregivers were willing to modify their child's lifestyle to enhance prevention. However, it is noteworthy that approximately 47% of caregivers engaged in self-medication for their children's headaches (
Table 3).
3. Evaluation of standard practices among caregivers
The majority of caregivers believed that lifestyle modification and avoidance of triggering factors constitute the most effective treatment for migraines. They were also open to undergoing tests for migraines as recommended by their physicians. Furthermore, they were knowledgeable about the latest treatment modalities for migraines, which include newer drugs, cognitive behavioral therapy, yoga, and neuromodulation (
Table 4).
Significant associations (
P<0.05) were found between the level of education and questions pertaining to the definition of migraine, prophylaxis, treatment, investigations, lifestyle modifications, and screen time, as compared to other questions related to the KAP of caregivers towards migraine (
Table 5).
Discussion
Migraines significantly impact a child's intellectual performance, memory, personality, and daily activities. There is a dearth of literature on the prevalence of pediatric headaches and the factors contributing to the recurrence of primary headaches. While questionnaire-based studies offer more reliable information and are feasible, clinical interviews remain the gold standard for such research. Increased awareness of the disease has positively impacted healthcare, leading to a decrease in morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have confirmed that patients' knowledge and awareness dramatically influence medication adherence behavior [
8].
Upon reviewing the existing literature, we concluded that our study is the first of its kind to assess the KAP among caregivers of children with migraines. Most of the studies mentioned in the literature focus on adult patients or physicians' knowledge of this chronic neurological disorder. In our study, over 60% of caregivers were aware of the chronic nature of the illness, its precipitating factors (such as skipping meals, bright light, stressors, specific food items, lack of sleep), and the role of family history and lifestyle modifications. This awareness level appears to be much higher compared to other studies, primarily those involving adults [
9]. However, only 46% of caregivers understood the pathophysiology of the illness, and 53% were familiar with the medication used for childhood migraines, both abortive and preventive. Our study also revealed that more than 85% of caregivers believed that migraines require a consultation with a doctor, may necessitate periodic visits for better treatment, and were ready to change their children’s lifestyles to prevent headache. This understanding will further assist clinicians in ruling out more serious causes of headaches that require urgent treatment. Our study also found that the majority of caregivers believed that lifestyle modification and avoiding precipitating factors are the best treatments for migraines. This belief was much more prevalent than in other adult studies mentioned in the literature [
10-
12]. Caregivers also expressed willingness to undergo tests for migraines as per physician advice and were aware of new treatment modalities for migraines. However, a significant percentage of caregivers (47%) practised self-medication for their children's headaches without consulting a doctor, a trend comparable to adult studies mentioned in the literature [
13]. This incorrect practice may be due to the availability of over-the-counter drugs and information through social media, which regulatory agencies should address and attempt to curb.
Significant associations (P<0.05) were found between the level of education and questions pertaining to the definition, prophylaxis, treatment, investigations, lifestyle modifications, and screen time related to migraine. This finding underscores the importance of educational level and knowledge about this chronic condition for improving the understanding and treatment of migraines in children.
In conclusion, most of the included participants had a strong educational background, and KAP regarding migraine prevention and treatment were adequate. However, the prevalent issue of self-medication without expert consultation was a significant concern. Health authorities should consider implementing educational programs that provide accurate information, foster positive attitudes, and enhance practical skills related to migraine. This could lead to an improved quality of life for children affected by migraine.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the contribution of all the staff of Pediatric Neurology Division.
Fig. 1.
Flow of study. OPD, outpatient department.
Table 1.
Demographic profile of study participants
Variable |
Value |
Mean age (yr) |
10.41±2.54 |
Sex |
|
Male |
53 |
Female |
47 |
Education level of the caregiver |
|
Undergraduate |
17 |
Graduate |
61 |
Postgraduate |
22 |
Table 2.
Evaluation of knowledge among caregivers
Question |
Yes (%) |
No (%) |
Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder in children |
76 |
24 |
Are you aware of precipitant factors for childhood migraine (skipping meals, bright light, stressors, any particular food items, lack of sleep)? |
74 |
26 |
Is it caused by abnormal brain activity or vascular disturbance? |
46 |
54 |
Is family history important in migraine? |
61 |
39 |
Are you aware of medication used in childhood migraine (abortive and preventive agents)? |
53 |
47 |
Are you aware that lifestyle modification will be necessary for migraine prevention? |
63 |
37 |
Do you consider that severity of the migraine could decide the prophylaxis of a migraine? |
57 |
43 |
Do you consider that neuroimaging is always required for childhood migraine? |
64 |
36 |
Do you consider that prophylactic medication for migraine should be used for 3-6 months? |
19 |
81 |
Are you aware of HTP (House, Tree, and Person) psychological test? |
10 |
90 |
Table 3.
Evaluation of attitudes among caregivers
Question |
Yes (%) |
No (%) |
Would you be willing to consult a doctor for recurrent headaches? |
89 |
11 |
Would you take self medication? |
47 |
53 |
Would you be willing to change children's lifestyle? |
80 |
20 |
Would you be willing to visit the doctor periodically? |
76 |
24 |
Table 4.
Evaluation of standard practice in study participants
Question |
Yes (%) |
No (%) |
Are the acute treatment of headaches and lifestyle modification the best treatment for migraine? |
84 |
16 |
Would you like to avoid precipitant factors (skipping meals, bright light, stressors, any particular food items, lack of sleep)? |
70 |
30 |
Would you like to undergo tests for migraine? |
62 |
38 |
Would you like to reduce screen time to less than 1 hr/day? |
92 |
8 |
Are you aware of new modalities of treatment for migraine (newer drugs, cognitive behavioral therapy, yoga, neuromodulation)? |
51 |
49 |
Table 5.
Association between knowledge, attitudes, and practices of parents/caregiver with level of education
Question |
Response |
Undergraduate (n=17, %) |
Graduate (n=61, %) |
Postgraduate (n=22, %) |
P valuea
|
Is migraine is a chronic neurological disorder in children |
Yes |
12 (70.6) |
51 (83.6) |
13 (59.1) |
0.05 |
No |
5 (29.4) |
10 (16.4) |
9 (40.9) |
Do you consider that severity of the migraine could decide the prophylaxis of a migraine |
Yes |
12 (70.6) |
38 (62.3) |
7 (31.8) |
0.02 |
No |
5 (29.4) |
23 (37.7) |
15 (68.2) |
Do you consider that prophylactic medication for migraine be used for 3-6 months |
Yes |
4 (23.5) |
7 (11.5) |
8 (36.4) |
0.03 |
No |
13 (76.5) |
54 (88.5) |
14 (63.6) |
Would you like to modify your lifestyle for better prevention |
Yes |
7 (41.2) |
55 (90.2) |
18 (81.8) |
<0.0001 |
No |
10 (58.8) |
6 (9.8) |
4 (18.2) |
Would like to undergo tests for migraine |
Yes |
9 (52.9) |
33 (54.1) |
20 (90.9) |
0.007 |
No |
8 (47.1) |
28 (45.9) |
2 (9.1) |
Would you like to reduce screen time to less than 1 hr/day |
Yes |
11 (64.7) |
59 (96.7) |
22 (100) |
0.001 |
No |
6 (35.3) |
2 (3.3) |
0 |
References
3. Rothner AD. Migraine variants in children. Pediatr Ann 2018;47:e50-4.
4. Hershey AD, Powers SW, Vockell AL, LeCates S, Kabbouche MA, Maynard MK. PedMIDAS: development of a questionnaire to assess disability of migraines in children. Neurology 2001;57:2034-9.
7. Teleanu RI, Vladacenco O, Teleanu DM, Epure DA. Treatment of pediatric migraine: a review. Maedica (Bucur) 2016;11:136-43.
8. Bosworth HB. Medication adherence. In: Bosworth Heditor. Improving patient treatment adherence: a clinician’s guide. New York: SpringerScience+Business Media, LLC; 2010. p. 68-94.
10. Thomas R, Adepu R, Keshava BS, Harsha S, Parthasarathi G, Sebastian J. Impact of patient education on health related quality of life in migraine patients. World J Pharm Res 2014;3:982-97.
12. Gupta R, Malhotra A, Malhotra P. An observational study to assess the knowledge of migraine among patients with migraine at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 2019;8:502-6.
13. Alkhudhairi OS, Alghthy AM, Hindi WS, Alqassemi SI. Assessment of knowledge and attitude and practice towards migraine prevention and treatment among general population in Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Hosp Med 2018;73:6531-4.